Akhmetov’s assets freeze to be reviewed by Cyprus court on Feb. 27

2018/1/9 15:45:48

Analyst: “We think that this development slightly weakens Metinvest’s position in the negotiations with the markets within the liability management move, which is possible during January-February 2018.”

 


KYIV, Jan 9, 2018 - The assets of Rinat Akhmetov and of nine other persons and legal entities, including SCM (System Capital Management) Limited (Cyprus), which owns 71.24% of Ukraine’s largest steelmaker Metinvest (METINV), were frozen by the District Court of Nicosia on Dec. 27, the media reported last week. According to a subsequent report by the Financial Times, SCM appealed the decision on Jan. 8, and another hearing is scheduled for Feb. 27.

 

The court issued the freezing order in relation to an application by Raga Establishment Limited (formerly EPIC Telecom Invest Limited), which is fighting a legal battle with Akhmetov’s SCM holding. According to the Financial Times, Raga claims that SCM Financial Overseas, a part of the SCM group, owes it about USD 760 mln as a yet-unpaid part of the USD 860 mln purchase of Ukrtelecom (UTLM UK). The court’s decision imposes a minimum of USD 820.6 mln to remain frozen, with Interfax-Ukraine reporting that about USD 60.4 mln of this amount is the interest and legal fees that were awarded to Raga by the London Court of International Arbitrage around the beginning of December 2017.

 

Concorde analyst Dmytro Khoroshun added: “We think that this development slightly weakens Metinvest’s position in the negotiations with the markets within the liability management move, which is possible during January-February 2018. Indeed, the markets might argue that Metinvest’s desire to pay the dividends is rather desperate, because its majority owner, the SCM holding, needs the money badly – for example, to pay its debt to Raga.

 

In other words, we think that it would be difficult for Metinvest to use this asset freeze to its advantage in negotiations with the markets – for example, by implying a threat of forthcoming radical moves such as change of control or default. Rather, we think that this legal dispute might be used by Metinvest as a reason for why the holding needs to pay dividends now.

 

We are keeping our neutral view on METINV Eurobonds.

 

###

 

For more information, link here: www.concorde.ua

Printer Friendly Page Send this Story to a Friend Create a PDF from the article
 
Poster Thread